NTPC India | Power & Utilities
November 6, 2018
NTPC India
BUY
CMP
`154
Safe Play in the Sector
Target Price
`195
Investment Period
12 Months
NTPC India (NTPC) is the largest power utility in the Indian Power sector, having 24%
& 16% market share in the power generation & installed capacity in India
Stock Info
respectively. Private sector is in bad shape on back of poor business economics on
Sector
Power
back of slew of factors; mentioned in the report. On the other hand, NTPC India,
Market Cap (` cr)
1,26,650
which is a competitive player in the industry, supplies all its power under the long
Net Debt (` cr)
1,16,785
term PPA (Power Purchase Agreement); is insulated to Industry dynamics. Over the
Beta
0.6
52 Week High / Low
186/149
next 4 years, company’s CWIP will be capitalized. Thus, CWIP ratio to Net Fixed
Avg. Daily Volume
6,38,812
Assets will come down; due to commercialization of 4-5GW capacity/year; enhancing
Face Value (`)
10
the regulated ROE of the company and improving growth. Thus, given the pain in the
BSE Sensex
35,012
sector NTPC on back of its positioning and valuations at
1.1xPBV FY2019E
Nifty
10,553
Reuters Code
NTPC.BO
valuations, offers good entry for long-term investors. We recommend a Buy.
Bloomberg Code
NTPC.IN
Electricity Sector; woes still hard to ignore: Though government has allowed private
participation in the sector, private sector has not been able to dent the space; given
Shareholding Pattern (%)
Promoters
61.8
most of them are not profitable and have done heavy bidding for power projects.
MF / Banks / Indian Fls
24.7
While the demand is likely to improve over next 5 years and new supplies are
FII / NRIs / OCBs
11.7
moderating, we still believe that the PLF’s of the industry will rise moderately but with
Indian Public / Others
1.9
a downward risk. Thus, we believe that while possibly the major negativity could be
behind us, it is unlikely that the industry will be out of woods soon.
Abs.(%)
3m 1yr
3yr
Sensex
(7.7)
4.1
31.6
NTPC safe haven to take exposure; given its competitive advantages: Unlike its
NTPC
(3.7)
(14.9)
15.7
private players, NTPC's projects operate under the regulated ROE model.CERC
regulations ensure that power generators enjoy a fixed return of 15.5%, under the
regulated ROE model. Along with this NTPC is a cost competitive power producer; on
back of AFS (Assured Fuel Supply) & strong backing of government; which keeps its
cash flow healthy. NTPC a safe player in the Industry struggling with poor business
economics. In addition, valuations at 1.1xBV FY2019E, factor in a low ROE of 14.0%,
with no growth of current assets. Even at conservative valuations, the stock will
3-Year Daily Price Chart
provide an upside of 27%.
200
Key financials (Consolidated)
180
Y/E March (` cr)
FY2017
FY2018
FY2019E
FY2020E
160
Net sales
82,042
88,083
96,011
107,532
140
% chg
11.7
7.4
9.0
12.0
10,749
10,526
10,938
12,779
120
Net profit
% chg.
(1.4)
(2.1)
3.9
16.8
100
EBITDA margin (%)
26.2
25.4
25.5
25.7
EPS (`)
13.0
12.8
13.5
15.9
P/E (x)
11.8
12.0
11.6
9.9
Source: Company, Angel Research
P/BV (x)
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
RoE (%)
11.3
10.5
10.2
11.0
Sarabjit Kour Nangra
RoCE (%)
7.4
6.5
6.6
7.2
+91 22 3935 7800 Ext: 6806
EV/Sales (x)
3.0
2.9
2.8
2.3
Sarabjit @angelbroking.com
EV/EBITDA (x)
11.3
11.5
10.9
9.1
Source: Company, Angel Research; Note: CMP as of November 5, 2018
Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this report
1
NTPC India | Power & Utilities
Power generation sector; worst behind but woes hard to ignore
Indian Power Sector, which has been one of the heavily regulated sector has witness a
slew of reforms; the prominent being Electricity Act 2003; which enabled National
Electricity Policy, Rural Electrification, Open access in transmission, phased open access
in distribution, mandatory SERCs, license free generation and distribution, power
trading, mandatory metering and stringent penalties for theft of electricity.
Private Sector’s aggressive expansion plans take toll on the PLF’s
India has been a power deficit economy for long; which lead government take many
power reforms, including competitive bidding in power sector in 2006. In FY2008, the
power deficit rose to a 10-year high of 11%; aiding merchant power prices hit the roof,
rising upwards of Rs10/unit (V/s power tariff of Rs3-4/unit of coal based plants). Since
then the private sector took up projects aggressively, hoping to benefit from the trend.
In terms of installed generation capacity private sector share, which was at (14GW of
installed capacity with a market share of 11.4% in FY2006), has increased to (143GW
of installed capacity with market share of 43.6% in FY2017). Overall, installed
generation capacities grew at a CAGR of 9.2% during 2006-17; with private sector
capacities addition happening at a CAGR of 23.4%( conventional capacity addition
happened at a CAGR of 16.1%) during the same period. However, there counterparts
like Central & State Power generation companies witnessed capacity additions at CAGR
of 6.6% and 3.6% respectively.
On the demand side, during the same time, the demand has been at 1,212BU in
FY2018, registering a CAGR of ~4.6% during the period (FY2006-2018). Over the last
5 years, the power demand has grown at a CAGR of ~4.0% between fiscals 2013 and
2018 while the conventional installed generation capacities grew at a CAGR of 9.0%.
As a result, as an indicative average plant load factors (PLFs) of coal plants (~72% of
fuel of power plants) declined from 70% in FY2013 to 61% in FY2018. In particular,
the PLFs of the private sector generators were even lower at 55% in FY2018; similar to
state sector utilities. Central sector; on the other hand which sells power under long
term PPA had PLF’s of 72%. during the period.
Also at current Industry PLF’s, the power deficit of the industry came down to almost
0.7%, while peak demand deficit is around 2.0% in FY2017-18. This indicates that
current operative capacities (at current PLF) in the Industry are sufficient to address the
power demand without expansion.
PLF’s unlikely to see major improvement in near term
Demand drivers in place; expect a pick-up
The demand potential of power is still intact as power consumption per capita in the
most efficient power, country Hong Kong is around 6,073KWh V/s 1,205KWh in India.
The world average of per capita power consumption stood at 3,126 KWh In addition,
Indian government has put up the overall Indian per capita demand to increase to
3,000kwH by FY2040; expected CAGR of 4.6%. As per Crisil, India’s per capita
electricity, consumption will rise gradually at 5.0% CAGR between FY2019-2023. This
will be driven by improvement in access to electricity in terms of quality and reliability
because of intensive rural electrification and reduction in cost of power supply, resulting
November 6, 2018
2
NTPC India | Power & Utilities
in realization of latent demand from the residential segment. In terms of units, the
power consumption will grow a CAGR of 6.5-6.7% during FY2019-2023.
But capex plans still alive; at 35GW (excl. renewables) for FY2019-23
While there are 50GW (excluding renewables) worth of power projects on paper for
next five years, it is unlikely that all will see the light; mainly given the constraints in the
Industry discussed below. As per Crisil, capacity additions in power generation are
expected to slow down to 35 GW (excluding renewables) between fiscals 2019 to 2023
as compared to 88 GW over the past five years. Almost ~65% capacity additions is
expected to be by the Central government sector having power purchase agreements
and fuel supply arrangements already in place. NTPC will dominate the capacity
additions backed by strong execution skills, sound financial strength as well as assured
power off-take by PPA holder discoms which insulates it from any downward risk
for upcoming capacities.
Crisil expects ~85% of the total 35 GW capacity additions between fiscals 2019 and
2023 to be coal-based, led by a large number of planned projects and the fact that
coal continues to remain the most widely available and cheapest source of fuel. On the
other hand, there will not be any significant gas-based capacity additions over the next
five years because of severe constraints in domestic gas availability. In addition,
hydropower capacity additions are estimated at only about 3.2 GW because of long
gestation period and geological risks in these projects.
Main reasons for tempered capex plans are as follows:
Lack of fresh power purchase agreements
Fresh power purchase agreement (PPA) announcements by distribution companies
(discoms) have witnessed a sharp decline owing to fall in deficit levels and their poor
financial health. Between fiscals 2013 and 2018, only five discoms have conducted
case-I bids aggregating to ~9 GW to enter into new long-term PPAs. These states
include Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Kerala, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana. In fact, owing to
lower--than-expected growth in power demand and availability of cheaper power in the
short-term market, Uttar Pradesh cancelled the 3.8 GW quantum of bids in May 2017.
This implies that new PPAs would be difficult unless demand picks up sharply.
No Central and state players participated in the competitive-bidding process so far, as
they had been exempt from the process for a period of five years until January 2011.
Moreover, during this period, they entered into MoUs for several projects under the
fixed RoE model. For instance, NTPC has contracted about 60GW of capacities under
the MoU route; thus restricting any major incentive for new capex.
Private sector power generation segment is under financial stress….
Large capacity additions by the private sector (~80 GW of conventional source-based
plants between fiscals
2009 and
2018) without adequate off-take and fuel
arrangement have put pressure on the financials of generation companies.
The gravity of the situation can be gauged by a report of Parliamentary Standing
Committee on Energy tabled in Parliament in September’2018. According to the report,
Independent power producers (IPP) have been facing turbulent times. Most of the power
assets are under financial stress because of one or more reasons in varying proportions
November 6, 2018
3
NTPC India | Power & Utilities
a) lower supply of cheap domestic coal b) low demand for power than expected c)
delayed payments by distribution companies (DISCOM) d) inability of promoters to
infuse equity on account of financial stress e) aggressive tariffs bid under PPAs f)
aggressive bidding for coal mines and g) delays in disbursement of loans by banks, h)
lack of long term PPA’s (almost 21GW of capacity does not have long term PPA).
Overall, it pegs conventional IPP capacity of 66GW in India’s electricity sector (~40% of
the installed capacity of the IIP and ~70% of the conventional installed capacity of IIP in
FY2018) to be under various degrees of financial stress. These include 54GWof coal-
based power (44 assets), 6GW gas-based power (9 assets) and 4.5GW of hydropower
(13 assets). Crisil, expects, about 21 GW of commissioned capacities are reeling under
stress due to lack of long-term PPAs and weak power off-take. Although the
government has initiated several measures, robust pickup in power demand is crucial
for revival of the stressed generation segment.
… leading to a miniscule capex from private sector
Therefore, with such situation, the private sector expected to slow down their capacity
addition from that planned earlier. The trend has already been visible over the last two
years. The private sector capacity additions declined to 5 GW in fiscal 2017 and further
down to 4 GW in fiscal 2018 compared with average 12 GW being added in the
preceding five years. In addition, none of the private sector players have announced
new generation project over the past three years. Thus, private players would account
for only ~4 GW (12% of capacity additions) between fiscals 2019 and 2023 compared
with 54% share over the past five years.
Fuel another constraint; at least in near term
Coal constitutes a major chunk of the power generation as of now (almost 72% of the
power generation in FY2018 and 90% of the conventional fuel). As per Crisil, as of
September 2017 PPAs worth ~47 GW of the coal-based commissioned capacity were
signed under the competitive-bidding route. Of this, about 16 GW capacity were based
on imported coal, while the rest uses domestic coal. The power plant based on
imported coal; have suffered on back of the change in the Indonesian coal policy. With
most power companies not building in a push through of fuel costs, this has affected
the financial health of many power companies. The scenario, with the supply of the
domestic coal is also not conducive; more so given it is still a government monopoly.
Around 23 GW of projects are expected to be under pressure due to lack of domestic
coal availability.
However, the new coal allocation policy for power sector, 2017-SHAKTI (Scheme for
Harnessing and Allocating Koyala (Coal) Transparently in India) proposes to replace
the old linkage allocation policy with more transparent bidding-based linkages. The
policy would gradually improve domestic coal availability for about 28 GW of existing
and upcoming capacities by fiscal 2023.
Going forward, domestic coal supply to power plants is expected to rise at a CAGR of
~ 6.8% between fiscals 2019 and 2023 backed by higher output from captive mines as
well as growth in supply from CIL and Singareni Collieries Company Ltd (SCCL). Thus,
increased domestic coal production would lead to significant improvement in coal
availability over the next three-five years for power plants.
November 6, 2018
4
NTPC India | Power & Utilities
Delay in clearance, slow progress on civil works
Delay in land acquisition, rehabilitation and in obtaining environment and forest
clearances are expected to delay commissioning of projects. Some large hydro projects
in Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Arunachal Pradesh, and Sikkim have been delayed
due to issues such as shortage in workers, agitation by locals at project site, petitions
filed by various stakeholders, or lack of adequate environmental and forest clearances.
Consultation paper on New Tariff policy (FY2019-24)
Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) has released a consultation paper.
The paper is conceptual in nature and highlights issues and options for various tariff
parameters, inviting comments from industry participants. While it is just a consultation
paper not a regulation, in near term it could remain an overhang over the sectors
investments given that it is already railing under challenging time. The salient points of
the paper:
It does not intend to increase financial instability for existing and under
construction power assets having financial closure. Hence, RoE revision (if
any) will only be for new plants - those commissioning after 31st Mar’2019.
The paper indicates that even in a bear case the RoE cut may be limited 1%
(currently 15.5%).
Evaluating differential RoE for transmission vs. generation assets.
The paper invites comments on an optional model of implementing a 3-part
tariff for generation projects. Under this model, the tariff will be spilt into a)
fixed charge (interest, depreciation, part of O&M, RoE restricted to risk-free
rate), b) variable charge (rest of RoE and O&M) and c) energy charge for
actual fuel costs based on plant load factor (PLF).
The recovery of fixed charges is linked to target plant availability (PAF),
whereas variable charges are linked to the difference between availability
and dispatch. This implies that i) if PLF= target PAF (currently 80%), then the
plant earns full regulated RoE or ii) if PLF < target PAF, then it will loose RoE
on pro rata basis and iii) if PLF> target PAF then the plant gain on regulated
RoE on pro rata basis. While this is optically positive for high PLF plants, it is
equally negative for low PLF planst and adds much more complexity to state
discom power purchase decision-making.
The paper also proposes a similar segregation of inter-state transmission
charges (for Power Grid) between i) fixed charge for long-term open access
rights which recover only partial RoE (risk free rate) and ii) a variable charge
to recover the balance RoE which will be linked to actual amount of electricity
flowing through the line.
November 6, 2018
5
NTPC India | Power & Utilities
Thus worst behind but; woes hard to ignore
Thus, while the demand pick up is a good news for power generation companies, not
all will benefit from the uptick. We believe that the power overs supply situation is
alarming & will take long time to settle. While the only, savior could be the CERC paper
on new Tariff policy (FY2019-24), which proposes plant solder than 25 years, to
checked for retirement. It is not clear as to when and how this policy will shape up.
Coal based thermal power plants more than 25 years old are about 37GW, out of
which around 35.5GW capacity pertain to State / Central sector. If implemented
according to Crisil, it will lead ~10GW old plants to be retired, which will tighten the
market, making the PLF’s rise but slowly. Currently we are not factoring in any
replacement of old plants. There exists possibility of a moderate rise in the PLF’s to a
downward risk over the next 4-5 years, Thus, we believe that while possibly the major
negativity could be behind us, it is unlikely that the industry will be out of woods soon.
NTPC; safe haven in the space
Largest Power Generator in India
NTPC is the largest pan India power generator in the country, having significant market
share in terms of installed capacity as well has in terms of the electricity sold. As on
March’2018, the company had standalone-installed capacity of 46GW and coupled
with JV’s around ~54GW, thus having a market share of 16%. In terms of the electricity
generated, NTPC as on March’2018 sold around 294BU, accounting for almost 23%
market share in the market. Given its size & scope of operations, probably it will be
easier for NTPC to diversify and to spearhead the transition towards increasing non-
fossil fuel capacity. For the same it plans to make renewable fuel resources (solar, wind
& hydro) ~30% of its basket by 2032 (37GW out of the planned 130GW capacity
planned for FY2032).
In addition strong Government support, keeps NTPC’s financials healthy. Key ones
include a) Tri-Partite Agreement (TPAs) of the Union Cabinet and as agreed by the
states and RBI, have been extended for a further period of 10 to 15 years and 26 states
have signed the same. The original TPAs were valid up to October 31, 2016. In terms
of TPAs, any default in payment by the discoms of a state can be recovered directly
from the account of respective state governments with RBI. b) Discoms required to issue
LCs covering 105% of the average monthly billing. This has been 100% realization of
the dues within the stipulated period for the fifteenth year in succession. Also, a strong
government backing aids company to finance its projects at much lower cost than other
players; enhancing its competitive positioning.
Thus, NTPC given its leadership position along with strong government banking can
easily participate in any organic & inorganic opportunities present in the power
industry, given its size & scale of operations.
November 6, 2018
6
NTPC India | Power & Utilities
Long term PPA’s to insulate the company from industry dynamics
Tariffs for power projects are determined under two mechanisms - the fixed-return
model and the competitive-bidding model. The fixed-return model allows for complete
pass-through of costs (the norms for cost recovery are defined by the Central Electricity
Regulatory Commission (CERC) / respective State Electricity Regulatory Commissions
(SERCs) and also allow a fixed return of 15.5% on equity. On the other hand, under a
competitive bidding model, tariffs over the life of the project are fixed at the time of
entering into a power-purchase agreement. The National Tariff Policy, 2006, mandated
states to procure their power requirements through a competitive-bidding process. Both
central and state utilities were exempt from this rule for five years. However, after
January 2011, even Central and state utilities have been required to participate in the
bidding process to secure power purchase agreements (PPAs) for power off-take.
However, NTPC is yet to take the competitive bidding route for signing its Long term
PPA’s. NTPC's projects operate under the regulated ROE model. CERC regulations
ensure that power generators enjoy a fixed return of 15.5 per cent, under the regulated
ROE model. Moreover, the model also offers incentives to NTPC if operational
efficiencies outperform normative parameters defined by the CERC. Further, the
regulated tariff regime allows NTPC to pass on any increase in costs through higher
tariffs to state distribution utilities.
According to NTPC, it has already signed for almost 35GW in terms of the future
capex, thus it insulates NTPC from any risk arising out of the change in demand
dynamics as 100% of contracted power is guaranteed to be paid for as long as its
plant are available for production ( at PAF of 85%). Thus, while in rising demand
scenario, the company is unlikely to participate in the upswing in the power tariffs, we
believe given the debt driven nature of the industry, along with long gestation period of
the power projects, we believe an assured & long term PPA’s provide better visibility to
the overall IRR of the power projects. NTPC currently has ~44GW of operational
capacity under the regulated model with pipeline capacity of ~35GW plus signed
under the regulated model. This enables it to pass on increase in costs, limiting the
impact on profitability.
Long-term Fuel Security-Assured Fuel Supply & Strong Coal Mining
Portfolio
NTPC through sustained policy advocacy has secured a single ACQ (Annual Contracted
Quantity) for all its coal stations resulting in: Optimum utilization of coal leading to
reduction in ECR, Avoidance of loss of fixed charges due to coal shortage, More
efficient operation of power plants and Higher marginal contribution from operations.
NTPC has signed long term Fuel Supply Agreements (FSAs) with CIL and SCCL for
supply of coal for a period of 20 years for total ACQ (Annual Contracted Quantity) of
~169 MTPA. ACQ has almost taken care of almost more than ~90% of its annual
requirement, with very less dependence on imported coal. During the financial year
2017-18, less than 0.2% of company’s coal consumption was from imported sources.
Apart from this, the company has been allocated 10 coal blocks with estimated
geological reserves of ~7bn tones with estimated mining capacity of 111mn tones per
annum. With these coal blocks, NTPC aspires to become one of the largest captive coal
mining companies in the country. It is envisaged that by 2030, one-third of NTPC’s
requirement would be fulfilled from captive mines.
November 6, 2018
7
NTPC India | Power & Utilities
To further improve its fuel efficiency, company has almost 67-70% of its coal capacity
linked with the MGR/belt conveyor system to coal mines representing 10 out of 20 of its
coal plants, and for rest of the capacities it has MoU with Railways for ensuring smooth
coal transportation.
Competitive cost power producer in the Industry
NTPC has been running its plant very efficiently as evident by the PLF factor, where
NTPC has over the last two decades have maintained leadership. This is achieved by
company on back of sound maintenance practices & real-time monitoring ensure high
availability and efficient operations along with periodic structured Technical Audits
carried out for all units for identifying and correction of gaps. NTPC has been
consistently maintaining spread of 15%-16% in terms of PLF over the last 2 decades on
All-India level.
NTPC’s Coal stations achieved PLF of 77.9% against All India PLF of 60.7% in FY2018.
Also 6 NTPC coal stations among top 10 stations of the country in terms of PLF in
FY2018. Thus, efficiency of its plant along with economics of scale aids and competitive
factor mentioned above enable company to deliver consistent competitive tariffs. Thus
over an 11 year period, the company’s tariff have risen at a CAGR of 5.8%, while Fixed
component (~35% of the cost) rising 10% while variable (the remaining 65%) rising
around 4.1%. Thus, cost competitiveness will enable company to participate in the
industry in a healthy way. Thus the recent reforms like flexibility to use renewable
power to meet schedule from a thermal station and National Merit Order Operation for
reducing average cost of generation, will benefit NTPC.
Capex to improve the growth prospects
Over the last five years, while the private sector conventional capacity additions was at
a CAGR of 16.0%, NTPC capacity additions happened a CAGR of ~5.3%. In terms of
gross additions, NTPC gross block increased at a CAGR of 3.4% over FY2014-2018
V/s around 15.2% CAGR during FY2014-2009. This is mainly on back of higher CWIP
lying on the books. FY2018 marked the beginning of reversal in CWIP ratio and this
will continue due to commercialization of 4-5 GW capacity/year. Thus, CWIP as
percentage of CWIP plus Net Fixed Assets is expected to come down from 39% in
FY2018 to ~31% in FY2020E. NTPC expects this ratio to come down to almost 22% in
FY2022E. This will increase regulated ROE of the company. Conservatively, we expect
the regulated ROE of the company to grow at CAGR of 14.5% during the next four
years. Overall a capex of ~21GW (14GW standalone) is under construction (annually
adding 4-5GW/ year). For immediate future around 4.7GW & 5.9GW of capacity is
getting added up for FY2019E & FY2020E respectively. Over a long term, the company
has plans to have an installed capacity of 130GW by FY2032, a CAGR of 6.5% during
the period (FY2018-FY2032E).
Valuations, stock factors in a low ROE & growth prospects
Over FY2018-20E, the company will post a CAGR of 10.5% and 11.6% in the sales
and net profit respectively. Apart from the near term triggers, we believe that the long
term NTPC is well placed to tap the opportunity in the Industry; mainly on back of the
competitive advantages it enjoys. In the near term, the only risk to NTPC is the change
in Regulated RoE’s, but CERC consultation paper avocadoes the regulation to be
November 6, 2018
8
NTPC India | Power & Utilities
effective for assets commericalsing after March’2019. Thus the old assets will continue
to enjoy the 15.5% Regulated ROE’s.
NTPC is largely insulated from the pain associated with the sector makes it an attractive
bet from near term as well as long term. In addition, valuations at 1.1xBV FY2019E,
factor in a low ROE of 14.0%, with no growth of current assets. Thus even on a very
conservative basis, giving 1.5xBV to the regulated book (which implies current assets
will not grow at all); the target price on the stock will work out to be `195; an upside of
27.0%, and valuing the company at 1.3xP/BV on FY2020E BV. 10-year forward P/BV
multiple of the company has been at 1.8x.
Company Background
Government of India (GoI) incorporated NTPC in 1975 as a thermal power generation
company. Power generation and bulk sale of electricity forms NTPC's principal
business, and power is sold through long-term PPAs, mainly signed with state
distribution utilities. The company has installed capacity of 53.2GW (including joint
ventures and subsidiaries) as on March 31, 2018 represented around 16% of India’s
capacity and ~23% of the power produced. Coal-based capacities dominate the fuel
mix of NTPC group- of the total installed capacity around 85% capacity is coal-based,
while the balance is based on gas, hydro and renewable projects. The company has
undertaken backward and forward integration and has entered into related businesses,
such as consultancy, coal mining and power trading.
November 6, 2018
9
NTPC India | Power & Utilities
Profit & loss statement (Consolidated)
Y/E March (`cr)
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
FY2019E
FY2020E
Gross sales
73,426
82,042
88,083
96,011
107,532
Net Sales
73,426
82,042
88,083
96,011
107,532
Other operating income
482
1,460
1,788
1,748
1,748
Total operating income
73,908
83,502
89,872
97,759
109,281
% chg
(8.7)
13.0
7.6
8.8
11.8
Total Expenditure
55,003
60,528
65,709
71,553
79,927
Net Raw Materials
47,727
52,550
55,691
61,063
67,960
Other Mfg costs
2,231
2,564
2,937
3,231
3,738
Personnel
4,694
5,243
5,758
6,559
7,471
Other
351
171
1,323
700
759
EBITDA
18,424
21,515
22,375
24,458
27,605
% chg
6.3
16.8
4.0
9.3
12.9
(% of Net Sales)
25.1
26.2
25.4
25.5
25.7
Depreciation& Amortization
5,771
6,010
7,460
7,847
8,814
EBIT
12,652
15,505
14,915
16,612
18,791
% chg
7.5
22.5
(3.8)
11.4
13.1
(% of Net Sales)
17.2
18.9
16.9
17.3
17.5
Interest & other Charges
3,366
3,753
4,447
5,610
5,592
Other Income
949
252
252
252
252
(% of PBT)
8.9
1.9
2.0
1.9
1.7
Share in profit of Associates
-
-
-
-
-
Recurring PBT
10,717
13,463
12,508
13,002
15,199
% chg
3.8
25.6
(7.1)
3.9
16.9
Extraordinary Expense/(Inc.)
98.8
36.8
(21.0)
-
-
PBT (reported)
10,618
13,426
12,529
13,002
15,199
Tax
(162.8)
2,712.4
2,027.8
2,106.2
2,462.2
(% of PBT)
(1.5)
20.2
16.2
16.2
16.2
PAT (reported)
10,781
10,714
10,502
10,895
12,737
Add: Share of earnings of associate
-
-
-
-
-
Less: Minority interest (MI)
(20)
(6)
(42)
(42)
(42)
Prior period items
-
-
-
-
-
PAT after MI (reported)
10,801
10,720
10,544
10,938
12,779
ADJ. PAT
10,901
10,749
10,526
10,938
12,779
% chg
10.5
(1.4)
(2.1)
3.9
16.8
(% of Net Sales)
14.7
13.1
12.0
11.4
11.9
Basic EPS (Rs)
13.2
13.0
12.8
13.3
15.5
% chg
10.5
(1.4)
(2.1)
3.9
16.8
November 6, 2018
10
NTPC India | Power & Utilities
Balance sheet (Consolidated)
Y/E March (` cr)
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
FY2019E FY2020E
SOURCES OF FUNDS
Equity Share Capital
8,245
8,245
8,245
8,245
8,245
Share Application Money
-
-
-
-
-
Reserves & Surplus
83,330
89,593
95,318
103,383
112,416
Shareholders Funds
91,576
97,838
103,563
111,628
120,661
Minority Interest
793
803
948
948
948
Long-term provisions
6,302
5,746
5,023
5,023
5,023
Total Loans
99,424
113,773
130,049
145,117
130,605
Deferred Tax Liability
1,153
1,485
2,408
2,408
2,408
Total Liabilities
199,248
219,645
241,991
265,124
259,645
APPLICATION OF FUNDS
Gross Block
98,844
117,088
150,153
163,710
188,848
Less: Acc. Depreciation
5,915
12,556
20,615
28,522
36,472
Net Block
92,929
104,532
129,538
135,187
152,376
Capital Work-in-Progress
75,046
86,896
82,093
92,959
66,868
Goodwill
-
-
-
-
-
Investments
6,473
7,614
8,876
8,876
8,876
Long-term loans and adv.
19,617
19,447
14,612
14,612
14,612
Current Assets
30,599
30,113
39,379
49,671
57,183
Cash
4,938
3,301
4,388
9,762
11,652
Loans & Advances
10,228
11,158
19,909
22,895
26,329
Other
15,433
15,653
15,083
17,014
19,201
Current liabilities
25,417
28,956
32,508
36,181
40,270
Net Current Assets
5,182
1,157
6,871
13,490
16,913
Total Assets
199,248
219,645
241,991
265,124
259,645
November 6, 2018
11
NTPC India | Power & Utilities
Cash flow statement (Consolidated)
Y/E March (` cr)
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
FY2019E FY2020E
Profit before tax
10,618
13,426
12,529
13,002
15,199
Depreciation
5,771
6,010
7,460
7,847
8,814
(Inc)/Dec in Working Capital
(442)
2,218
(9,463)
(1,244)
(1,533)
Less: Other income
949
252
252
252
252
Direct taxes paid
163
(2,712)
(2,028)
(2,106)
(2,462)
Cash Flow from Operations
15,161
18,690
8,247
17,246
19,766
(Inc.)/Dec.in Fixed Assets
38,026
(30,094)
(28,263)
(24,422)
952
(Inc.)/Dec. in Investments
4,572
1,141
1,262
-
-
Other income
949
252
252
252
252
Cash Flow from Investing
43,546
(28,702)
(26,749)
(24,170)
1,203
Issue of Equity
-
-
-
-
-
Inc./(Dec.) in loans
(2,828)
14,350
16,275
15,068
(14,512)
Dividend Paid (Incl. Tax)
(3,232)
(4,611)
(4,939)
(4,479)
(5,233)
Others
(61,960)
(1,364)
8,253
1,710
665
Cash Flow from Financing
(68,020)
8,374
19,589
12,299
(19,080)
Inc./(Dec.) in Cash
(9,313)
(1,637)
1,086
5,375
1,890
Opening Cash balances
14,252
4,938
3,301
4,388
9,762
Closing Cash balances
4,938
3,301
4,388
9,762
11,652
November 6, 2018
12
NTPC India | Power & Utilities
Key ratios
Y/E March
FY2016
FY2017
FY2018
FY2019E FY2020E
Valuation Ratio (x)
P/E (on FDEPS)
11.6
11.8
12.0
11.6
9.9
P/CEPS
7.6
7.6
7.0
6.7
5.9
P/BV
1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1
1.0
Dividend yield (%)
2.2
3.1
3.3
3.0
3.5
EV/Sales
3.1
3.0
2.9
2.8
2.3
EV/EBITDA
12.3
11.3
11.5
10.9
9.1
EV / Total Assets
1.1
1.1
1.1
1.0
1.0
Per Share Data (`)
EPS (Basic)
13.2
13.0
12.8
13.3
15.5
EPS (fully diluted)
13.2
13.0
12.8
13.3
15.5
20.1
20.3
21.8
22.8
26.2
Cash EPS
DPS
3.4
4.8
5.1
4.6
5.4
Book Value
111.1
118.7
125.6
135.4
146.3
Dupont Analysis
EBIT margin
17.2
18.9
16.9
17.3
17.5
Tax retention ratio
101.5
79.8
83.8
83.8
83.8
Asset turnover (x)
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.4
ROIC (Post-tax)
6.9
6.1
5.6
5.8
6.4
Cost of Debt (Post Tax)
3.4
2.8
3.1
3.4
3.4
Leverage (x)
1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.1
Operating ROE
10.7
9.7
8.6
8.6
9.6
Returns (%)
ROCE (Pre-tax)
6.5
7.4
6.5
6.6
7.2
Angel ROIC (Pre-tax)
11.0
12.5
10.5
10.5
10.9
ROE
12.6
11.3
10.5
10.2
11.0
Turnover ratios (x)
Asset Turnover (Gross Block)
0.6
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.6
Inventory / Sales (days)
19
18
21
24
25
Receivables (days)
20
16
12
12
12
Payables (days)
25
23
22
22
22
(3)
(4)
1
12
15
WC cycle (ex-cash) (days)
Solvency ratios (x)
Net debt to equity
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.0
Net debt to EBITDA
5.1
5.1
5.6
5.5
4.3
Interest Coverage (EBIT / Int.)
3.8
4.1
3.4
3.0
3.4
November 6, 2018
13
NTPC India | Power & Utilities
Research Team Tel: 022 - 39357800
DISCLAIMER
Angel Broking Limited (hereinafter referred to as “Angel”) is a registered Member of National Stock Exchange of India Limited, Bombay
Stock Exchange Limited, Metropolitan Stock Exchange Limited, Multi Commodity Exchange of India Ltd and National Commodity &
Derivatives Exchange Ltd It is also registered as a Depository Participant with CDSL and Portfolio Manager and Investment Adviser with
SEBI. It also has registration with AMFI as a Mutual Fund Distributor. Angel Broking Limited is a registered entity with SEBI for Research
Analyst in terms of SEBI (Research Analyst) Regulations, 2014 vide registration number INH000000164. Angel or its associates has not
been debarred/ suspended by SEBI or any other regulatory authority for accessing /dealing in securities Market. Angel or its
associates/analyst has not received any compensation / managed or co-managed public offering of securities of the company covered
by Analyst during the past twelve months.
This document is solely for the personal information of the recipient, and must not be singularly used as the basis of any investment
decision. Nothing in this document should be construed as investment or financial advice. Each recipient of this document should
make such investigations as they deem necessary to arrive at an independent evaluation of an investment in the securities of the
companies referred to in this document (including the merits and risks involved), and should consult their own advisors to determine
the merits and risks of such an investment.
Reports based on technical and derivative analysis center on studying charts of a stock's price movement, outstanding positions and
trading volume, as opposed to focusing on a company's fundamentals and, as such, may not match with a report on a company's
fundamentals. Investors are advised to refer the Fundamental and Technical Research Reports available on our website to evaluate the
contrary view, if any
The information in this document has been printed on the basis of publicly available information, internal data and other reliable
sources believed to be true, but we do not represent that it is accurate or complete and it should not be relied on as such, as this
document is for general guidance only. Angel Broking Limited or any of its affiliates/ group companies shall not be in any way
responsible for any loss or damage that may arise to any person from any inadvertent error in the information contained in this report.
Angel Broking Limited has not independently verified all the information contained within this document. Accordingly, we cannot testify,
nor make any representation or warranty, express or implied, to the accuracy, contents or data contained within this document. While
Angel Broking Limited endeavors to update on a reasonable basis the information discussed in this material, there may be regulatory,
compliance, or other reasons that prevent us from doing so.
This document is being supplied to you solely for your information, and its contents, information or data may not be reproduced,
redistributed or passed on, directly or indirectly.
Neither Angel Broking Limited, nor its directors, employees or affiliates shall be liable for any loss or damage that may arise from or in
connection with the use of this information.
Disclosure of Interest Statement
NTPC India
1. Financial interest of research analyst or Angel or his Associate or his relative
No
2. Ownership of 1% or more of the stock by research analyst or Angel or associates or
No
relatives
3. Served as an officer, director or employee of the company covered under Research
No
4. Broking relationship with company covered under Research
No
Ratings (Based on expected returns
Buy (> 15%)
Accumulate (5% to 15%)
Neutral (-5 to 5%)
over 12 months investment period):
Reduce (-5% to -15%)
Sell (< -15)
November 6, 2018
14